There are some situations where the deficiencies are apparent and need upgrading, for example:

• Fire safety equipment that is past the manufacturer’s recommended replacement dates and should be replaced, e.g. ionization smoke detectors have a 10-15 year life span, or some sprinkler heads need to be replaced after 50 years.
• Fire safety equipment that is not at an acceptable working level, such as a low pressure standpipe system that is inadequate for the responding fire department.

For situations that are not as apparent, the Local Assistant needs to determine whether the deficiencies identified warrant upgrades. There are many factors which will affect the conclusion on a case-by-case review:

• What are the site specific conditions, such as:
  • What are the occupants’ profiles?
  • How is the building maintained?
  • What are the building hazards?
  • Are there changes to the use of the building beyond the original design?
  • If construction is involved, are there site restrictions?
• What are the fire risks if the upgrades do not occur?
• Assess why “status quo” is no longer acceptable, such as:
  • Have the occupants’ profiles changed?
  • Are there changes to the fire response?
  • Is there change in traffic pattern?
• What are the fire bylaws or fire risk objectives of the local government?
• What was done previously in a similar situation?
• What are the available fire resources?
  • Fire departments across BC do not have the same equipment or training, e.g. lack of hazardous material response teams.
• What are the local resources, such as availability of trades, to implement the upgrades?

If you need assistance in evaluating a specific building, please contact the OFC.

Return to Upgrading of Existing Buildings - Introduction
Return to Main LAFC Resource Site
For general information visit the OFC Website